Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at the end of relation
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-17T19:12:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add TRUNCATE parameter to VACUUM.
- b84dbc8eb80b 12.0 landed
-
Add vacuum_truncate reloption.
- 119dcfad988d 12.0 landed
-
Allow VACUUM to be run with index cleanup disabled.
- a96c41feec6b 12.0 cited
On 2018-04-17 15:09:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > > Andres was working on a radix tree structure to fix this problem, but > > that seems to be abandoned now, and it seems a major undertaking. I hope to re-ignite work on that later in the v12 cycle. But realistically that means it's not going to be mergable for v12. > > While I agree that the proposed solution is a wart, it seems much > > better than no solution at all. Can we consider Fujii's proposal as > > a temporary measure until we fix shared buffers? I'm +1 on it > > myself. > > Once we've introduced a user-visible reloption it's going to be > practically impossible to get rid of it, so I'm -1. It's not much work to maintain though? And even the brief AEL lock can cause troubles, leaving the scan aside. So I'm like +0.1 or such. Greetings, Andres Freund