Re: pgsql: Support partition pruning at execution time
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-committers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-04-08T00:15:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Yeah, I don't quite understand this problem, and I tend to agree that it likely isn't this patch's fault. However, for the moment I'm going to avoid pushing the patch you propose because maybe there's a bug elsewhere and it'd be good to understand it. I'm looking at it now. If others would prefer me to push David's patch (or do so themselves), I'm not dead set against that. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Update Append's idea of first_partial_plan
- b7e2cbc5b49f 11.0 landed
-
Fix IndexOnlyScan counter for heap fetches in parallel mode
- 15a8f8caad14 11.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect logic for choosing the next Parallel Append subplan
- 468abb8f7a69 11.0 landed
-
Minor comment updates
- d7a95f06a1a1 11.0 landed
-
Attempt to stabilize partition_prune test output.
- b47a86f5008f 11.0 landed
-
Support partition pruning at execution time
- 499be013de65 11.0 cited