Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold.

Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>

From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: sawada.mshk@gmail.com
Cc: teodor@sigaev.ru, a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru, simon@2ndquadrant.com, y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru, pg@bowt.ie, andres@anarazel.de, robertmhaas@gmail.com, david@pgmasters.net, amit.kapila16@gmail.com, ideriha.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Date: 2018-04-06T08:33:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:52:58 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote in <CAD21AoCYWuKu4yvTLE1Hgv2SsJRnBjYweTztTkBABUykXonb1w@mail.gmail.com>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
> > Thanks to everyone, fixes are pushed except nodeMerge.c, I don't wish to
> > increase entropy around MERGE patch :)

No problem. Thanks!

> Thank you!

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



Commits

  1. Fix upper limit for vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor

  2. Increase upper limit for vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor

  3. Fixes for vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor GUC option

  4. Skip full index scan during cleanup of B-tree indexes when possible