Re: Rethinking -L switch handling and construction of LDFLAGS

Hi,

On 2018-04-01 13:55:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Why don't we change the link commands to reference LDFLAGS_INTERNAL
> > explicitly?  That seems like it'd be cleaner.
> 
> I'm hesitant to do that because LDFLAGS is a name known to make's
> default rules, and I don't want to bet that we're not relying on
> those default rules anywhere.

FWIW, postgres builds cleanly with -r -R in MAKELAGS.

Greetings,

Andres Freund