Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>,
Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-04T22:49:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make FP_LOCK_SLOTS_PER_BACKEND look like a function
- c878de1db438 18.0 landed
-
Fix asserts in fast-path locking code
- a7e5237f268e 18.0 landed
-
Increase the number of fast-path lock slots
- c4d5cb71d229 18.0 landed
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> I think I found a logic bug. Testing.
Oh! I bet you are looking at this 18-to-19 diff:
@@ -416,7 +416,8 @@ sub check_install_is_complete
{
$tmp_loc = "$tmp_loc/$install_dir";
$bindir = "$tmp_loc/bin";
- $libdir = "$tmp_loc/lib/postgresql";
+ $libdir = "$tmp_loc/lib";
+ $libdir .= '/postgresql' unless $libdir =~ /postgres|pgsql/;
return (-d $bindir && -d $libdir);
}
elsif (-e "$build_dir/src/Makefile.global") # i.e. not msvc
@@ -427,7 +428,8 @@ sub check_install_is_complete
chomp $suffix;
$tmp_loc = "$tmp_loc/$install_dir";
$bindir = "$tmp_loc/bin";
- $libdir = "$tmp_loc/lib/postgresql";
+ $libdir = "$tmp_loc/lib";
+ $libdir .= '/postgresql' unless $libdir =~ /postgres|pgsql/;
}
I'd dismissed that because sifaka isn't running in a directory
that has "postgres" or "pgsql" in its path, but just now I looked
at the logs of one of these steps, and guess where it's installing:
/usr/bin/make -C '../../../..' DESTDIR='/Users/buildfarm/bf-data/HEAD/pgsql.build'/tmp_install install >'/Users/buildfarm/bf-data/HEAD/pgsql.build'/tmp_install/log/install.log 2>&1
I bet the "pgsql.build" name is confusing it into doing extra
installs. This'd explain the impression I had that the test steps
were running a bit slower than they ought to. If you check
sifaka's just-posted green run against its history, that run took
13:48 versus recent times of 10:35 or thereabouts, so we're definitely
eating a good deal of time someplace...
regards, tom lane