Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: "Wood, Dan" <hexpert@amazon.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, pgsql-committers@postgresql.org, "Wong, Yi Wen" <yiwong@amazon.com>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-12-06T08:03:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2017-11-20 11:18:45 -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2017-11-13 19:03:41 -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2017-11-03 07:53:30 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > > Here's that patch. I've stared at this some, and Robert did too. Robert > > > mentioned that the commit message might need some polish and I'm not > > > 100% sure about the error message texts yet. > > > > > > I'm not yet convinced that the new elog in vacuumlazy can never trigger > > > - but I also don't think we want to actually freeze the tuple in that > > > case. > > > > I'm fairly sure it could be triggered, therefore I've rewritten that. > > > > I've played around quite some with the attached patch. So far, after > > applying the second patch, neither VACUUM nor VACUUM FULL / CLUSTER make > > the situation worse for already existing corruption. HOT pruning can > > change the exact appearance of existing corruption a bit, but I don't > > think it can make the corruption meaningfully worse. It's a bit > > annoying and scary to add so many checks to backbranches but it kinda > > seems required. The error message texts aren't perfect, but these are > > "should never be hit" type elog()s so I'm not too worried about that. > > > > > > Please review! > > Ping? Alvaro, it'd be good to get some input here. Ping. I'm a bit surprised that a bug fixing a significant data corruption issue has gotten no reviews at all. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Backport addition of rs_old_rel to rewriteheap's state.
- 152a56905658 9.3.21 landed
-
Perform a lot more sanity checks when freezing tuples.
- ed8e1aff6ace 9.4.16 landed
- d3044f8b0732 10.2 landed
- 986a9153b970 9.6.7 landed
- 94d1c88103ff 9.5.11 landed
- 4800f16a7ad0 9.3.21 landed
- 699bf7d05c68 11.0 landed
-
Revert bogus fixes of HOT-freezing bug
- c6764eb3aea6 11.0 landed
- f05ae2fa94b4 9.3.20 landed
- ef0339ee5dcf 9.4.15 landed
- b3888b60d3f0 9.5.10 landed
- 7a95966bc03c 10.1 landed
- 08ba67d596a1 9.6.6 landed
-
Fix traversal of half-frozen update chains
- a5736bf754c8 11.0 landed
- fc0df3bdafd6 9.5.10 landed
- d441cff14249 9.6.6 landed
- b052d524ca71 9.3.20 landed
- 8b6d85f2dc1e 9.4.15 landed
- 22576734b805 10.1 landed
-
Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple
- 46c35116ae1a 10.0 cited
- 20b655224249 11.0 cited
-
During index build, check and elog (not just Assert) for broken HOT chain.
- d70cf811f7dd 9.4.0 cited
-
Fix WAL replay of locking an updated tuple
- 6bfa88acd3df 9.4.0 cited
-
Change the way we mark tuples as frozen.
- 37484ad2aace 9.4.0 cited