Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

Artur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Arthur Zakirov <a.zakirov@postgrespro.ru>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Alex Ignatov <a.ignatov@postgrespro.ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-30T20:47:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:39:56AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> 
> So is it now the case that all of the regression test cases in this
> patch produce the same results as they would on Oracle?
> 

Yes, exactly. All new cases give the same result as in Oracle, except
text of error messages.

-- 
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

Commits

  1. Improve behavior of to_timestamp()/to_date() functions

  2. Implement TZH and TZM timestamp format patterns

  3. as attache of this mail is patch (to the main tree) with to_char's