Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, "Wood, Dan" <hexpert@amazon.com>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers@postgresql.org>, "Wong, Yi Wen" <yiwong@amazon.com>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-10T00:53:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2017-11-09 16:45:07 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > >> Actually, on second thought, I take that back -- I don't think that > >> REINDEXing will even finish once a HOT chain is broken by the bug. > >> IndexBuildHeapScan() actually does quite a good job of making sure > >> that HOT chains are sane, which is how the enhanced amcheck notices > >> the bug here in practice. > > > > I think that's too optimistic. > > Why? Because the "find the TID of the root" logic in > IndexBuildHeapScan()/heap_get_root_tuples() won't reliably find the > actual root (it might be some other HOT chain root following TID > recycling by VACUUM)? Primarily because it's not an anti-corruption tool. I'd be surprised if there weren't ways to corrupt the page using these corruptions that aren't detected by it. But even if it were, I don't think there's enough information to do so in the general case. You very well can end up with pages where subsequent hot pruning has removed a good bit of the direct evidence of this bug. But I'm not really sure why the error detection capabilities of matter much for the principal point I raised, which is how much work we need to do to not further worsen the corruption. Greetings, Andres Freund
Commits
-
Backport addition of rs_old_rel to rewriteheap's state.
- 152a56905658 9.3.21 landed
-
Perform a lot more sanity checks when freezing tuples.
- ed8e1aff6ace 9.4.16 landed
- d3044f8b0732 10.2 landed
- 986a9153b970 9.6.7 landed
- 94d1c88103ff 9.5.11 landed
- 4800f16a7ad0 9.3.21 landed
- 699bf7d05c68 11.0 landed
-
Revert bogus fixes of HOT-freezing bug
- c6764eb3aea6 11.0 landed
- f05ae2fa94b4 9.3.20 landed
- ef0339ee5dcf 9.4.15 landed
- b3888b60d3f0 9.5.10 landed
- 7a95966bc03c 10.1 landed
- 08ba67d596a1 9.6.6 landed
-
Fix traversal of half-frozen update chains
- a5736bf754c8 11.0 landed
- fc0df3bdafd6 9.5.10 landed
- d441cff14249 9.6.6 landed
- b052d524ca71 9.3.20 landed
- 8b6d85f2dc1e 9.4.15 landed
- 22576734b805 10.1 landed
-
Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple
- 46c35116ae1a 10.0 cited
- 20b655224249 11.0 cited
-
During index build, check and elog (not just Assert) for broken HOT chain.
- d70cf811f7dd 9.4.0 cited
-
Fix WAL replay of locking an updated tuple
- 6bfa88acd3df 9.4.0 cited
-
Change the way we mark tuples as frozen.
- 37484ad2aace 9.4.0 cited