Re: Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Sachin Kotwal <kotsachin@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-15T13:56:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greetings, * Sachin Kotwal (kotsachin@gmail.com) wrote: > Thanks. I understand this is small but new feature and not bug fix. > But we should be able to backpatch if there is no dependency. No, it's a new feature and won't be back-patched. > It will help users to get benefit of this feature for g96 and pg95 in RDS > until they will have pg10 in RDS. There is no need to wait for pg10 to be in RDS to use PG10's pg_dumpall against RDS databases. pg_dump and pg_dumpall are very intentionally designed and intended to work against older versions of PG, so as soon as PG10 is released you'll be able to run PG10's pg_dumpall against your 9.6 or 9.5 RDS databases. > If It is against community policy then it is ok. I can understand. It is against community policy to back-patch features. Thanks! Stephen
Commits
-
Fix dumping role comments when using --no-role-passwords
- d82cb467bbc2 12.19 landed
- be01c8c3450e 14.12 landed
- affc46b76d50 13.15 landed
- 7e65ad197f9d 17.0 landed
- 5863bacb87c1 16.3 landed
- 12128be623fd 15.7 landed