Re: Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-03-08T21:49:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2017-03-08 16:32:49 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 3/6/17 19:53, Andres Freund wrote: > > I'm just not quite sure what the best way is to make it easier to run > > tests in parallel within the tree. > > make check-world -j2 seems to run fine for me. Hm, I at least used to get a lot of spurious failures with this. I e.g. don't think the free port selection is race free. Also that doesn't solve the issue of the time spent in repetitive initdbs - but that's mainly in contrib, and we probably solve that there by having a special target in contrib/ building a cluster once. > You can also run prove with a -j option. Ah, interesting. > (The problem is that parallel make and parallel tests together might > explode a bit, so we might want some way to control which aspect we > parallelize.) Yea, I indeed see that. Probably could do a top-level prerequisite for check on a check-world subset that includes docs? - Andres
Commits
-
Improve isolation tests infrastructure.
- 60f826c5e624 10.0 landed