Re: Time to up bgwriter_lru_maxpages?
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-04T01:34:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2017-02-03 19:26:55 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 2/3/17 6:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > - The ringbuffers in shared buffers can be problematic. One possible way of > > > solving that is to get rid of ringbuffers entirely and rely on different > > > initial values for usage_count instead, but that's not desirable if it just > > > means more clock sweep work for backends. > > I'm not quite sure which ringbuffer you're referring to here? If to the > > new one, why is it problematic? > > No, I mean the non-default BufferAccessStrategy's. That's not a ringbuffer that's a buffer ring ;)
Commits
-
Increase upper bound for bgwriter_lru_maxpages.
- 14ca9abfbe46 10.0 landed