Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: michael.paquier@gmail.com
Cc: bossartn@amazon.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, sawada.mshk@gmail.com,
david.g.johnston@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Date: 2017-09-13T08:32:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello, At Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:28:20 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in <20170913.172820.141647434.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> > The context exists there before the patch but anyway using the > context as per-portal context that doesn't need freeing seems to > result in memory leak. It is released at the end of vacuum. So it's no problem. Sorry for the noise. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
Commits
-
Allow multiple tables to be specified in one VACUUM or ANALYZE command.
- 11d8d72c27a6 11.0 landed
-
Give a better error for duplicate entries in VACUUM/ANALYZE column list.
- ea31541f5648 9.6.6 landed
- e56facd8b300 9.2.24 landed
- b572b435ca67 9.4.15 landed
- a2b1eb23496e 10.0 landed
- a09d8be7ddaf 9.3.20 landed
- 71480501057f 11.0 landed
- 122289a66b92 9.5.10 landed
-
Reject ANALYZE commands during VACUUM FULL or another ANALYZE.
- e415b469b33b 9.5.0 cited