Re: Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables
Ildus Kurbangaliev <i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru>
From: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas
<robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-09-12T15:26:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 11:59:13 +0900 Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2017/07/21 19:16, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > > On 2017/07/20 11:21, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > >> On 2017/07/19 23:36, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> Please put the responsibility of doing const-expression > >>> simplification in these cases somewhere closer to where the > >>> problem is being created. > >> > >> It would be reasonable that it's the FDW's responsibility to do > >> that const-simplification if necessary? > > There seems to be no objections, so I removed the const-expression > > simplification from the patch and I added the note to the docs for > > AddForeignUpdateTargets. > > > > Attached is an updated version of the patch. > > I cleaned up the patch a bit. PFA a new version of the patch. > > Best regards, > Etsuro Fujita Checked, looks good to me. Changed status to 'Ready for Commiter'. -- --- Ildus Kurbangaliev Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com Russian Postgres Company
Commits
-
Fix creation of resjunk tlist entries for inherited mixed UPDATE/DELETE.
- 39f180fdd1e6 9.5.11 landed
- 06ba5309682e 9.6.7 landed
- a57aa430b613 10.2 landed
- 9a785ad57317 11.0 landed