Horton

Re: BUG #14808: V10-beta4, backend abort

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, phb07@apra.asso.fr, Andrew Gierth <rhodiumtoad@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-11T13:18:41Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs 
Tom Lane wrote:

> This actually seems like it might not be that big a change, other than
> the issue of what do the column lists mean exactly.  Maybe we should try
> to get it done for v10, rather than shipping known-non-spec-compliant
> behavior.

I think this means we need to abort RC1 today and get another beta out.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Fix SQL-spec incompatibilities in new transition table feature.

  2. Quick-hack fix for foreign key cascade vs triggers with transition tables.

  3. Fix transition tables for ON CONFLICT.

  4. Fix transition tables for wCTEs.

  5. Repair problems occurring when multiple RI updates have to be done to the same