Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
To: michael.paquier@gmail.com
Cc: peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, jobin.augustine@openscg.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, noah@leadboat.com, pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-08-17T01:50:30Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers 
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>>> He meant logical replication,
>>
>> Oh I could not find he meant logical replication in the original
>> report.
> 
> The second message of the thread says so, but the first does not
> mention logical replication at all.
>>From here are mentioned PG 9.6 and pg_basebackup:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHBggj8g2T+ZDcACZ2FmzX9CTxkWjKBsHd6NkYB4i9Ojf6K1Fw@mail.gmail.com.
> Explaining the confusion.

Oh, I see it now. Thanks.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

Commits

  1. Distinguish wait-for-connection from wait-for-write-ready on Windows.

  2. Use asynchronous connect API in libpqwalreceiver