Horton

Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, Daniel Verite <daniel@manitou-mail.org>, "Prabakaran, Vaishnavi" <VaishnaviP@fast.au.fujitsu.com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>, Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Manuel Kniep <m.kniep@web.de>, "fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp" <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "Iwata, Aya" <iwata.aya@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: 2017-06-19T22:49:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2017-04-05 15:45:26 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2017-04-05 17:00:42 +1000, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
> > Regarding test patch, I have corrected the test suite after David Steele's
> > comments.
> > Also, I would like to mention that a companion patch was submitted by David
> > Steele up-thread.
> > 
> > Attached the latest code and test patch.
> 
> My impression is that this'll need a couple more rounds of review. Given
> that this'll establish API we'll pretty much ever going to be able to
> change/remove, I think it'd be a bad idea to rush this into v10.
> Therefore I propose moving this to the next CF.

Craig, Vaishnavi, everyone else: Are you planning to continue to work on
this for v11?  I'm willing to do another round, but only if it's
worthwhile.

FWIW, I still think this needs a pgbench or similar example integration,
so we can actually properly measure the benefits.

- Andres

Commits

  1. Add libpq pipeline mode support to pgbench

  2. Implement pipeline mode in libpq