Horton

Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres@piotr-stefaniak.me>
Date: 2017-06-19T18:41:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 6/16/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
> >> code under src/tools/ in our main repo.  Is anyone really
> >> seriously against that?
> >
> > I think it would be better to have it separate.
> 
> +1.

+1.

Thanks!

Stephen

Commits

  1. Manually un-break a few URLs that pgindent used to insist on splitting.

  2. Remove entab and associated detritus.

  3. Phase 3 of pgindent updates.

  4. Phase 2 of pgindent updates.

  5. Initial pgindent run with pg_bsd_indent version 2.0.

  6. Adjust pgindent script to use pg_bsd_indent 2.0.

  7. Final pgindent run with old pg_bsd_indent (version 1.3).