Horton

Re: Misnaming of staext_dependencies_load

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-06-15T15:49:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> It is annoying that only staext_dependencies_load is prefixed
> with "staext" (two t's) among several similar names prefixed by
> "statext"(three t's).
> 
> Should we rename it to have the same prefix?

Sure.  Pushed, thanks.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Rename function for consistency