Re: Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression

On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 07:02:46PM +0000, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:29:29PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 4/30/17 04:05, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item.  Peter,
> > > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > > item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> > > v10 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> > > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> > > this message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
> > > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> > > well in advance of shipping v10.  Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> > > toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.
> > 
> > I'm working on this and will report on Friday.
> 
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
for your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
item ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
2017-05-09 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
ownership without further notice.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com