Re: snapbuild woes
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-05-04T05:45:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:42:58PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > > On April 27, 2017 9:34:44 PM PDT, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:36:21PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > >> On 2017-04-17 21:16:57 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > >> > I've since the previous update reviewed Petr's patch, which he > >since has > >> > updated over the weekend. I'll do another round tomorrow, and will > >see > >> > how it looks. I think we might need some more tests for this to be > >> > committable, so it might not become committable tomorrow. I hope > >we'll > >> > have something in tree by end of this week, if not I'll send an > >update. > >> > >> I was less productive this week than I'd hoped, and creating a > >testsuite > >> was more work than I'd anticipated, so I'm slightly lagging behind. > >I > >> hope to have a patchset tomorrow, aiming to commit something > >> Monday/Tuesday. > > > >This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. > >Kindly send > >a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent > >status > >update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > >https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com > > I committed part of the series today, plan to continue doing so over the next few days. Changes require careful review & testing, this is easy to get wrong... This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status update. Also, this open item has been alive for three weeks, well above guideline. I understand it's a tricky bug, but I'm worried this isn't on track to end. What is missing to make it end? Refer to the policy on open item ownership: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
Commits
-
Fix thinko introduced in 2bef06d516460 et al.
- d68742562ca4 9.4.13 landed
- 869a5869e5ba 9.5.8 landed
- 32d7480e02ee 9.6.4 landed
- 5af4456a5647 10.0 landed
-
Avoid superfluous work for commits during logical slot creation.
- fa9207c7415c 9.5.8 landed
- bd619fcfe046 9.6.4 landed
- 524dbc14335c 10.0 landed
- 2dca50b764d4 9.4.13 landed
-
Fix race condition leading to hanging logical slot creation.
- b64a68e3680a 9.5.8 landed
- 955a684e0401 10.0 landed
- 79abd23db1e9 9.4.13 landed
- 75784859cda2 9.6.4 landed
-
Don't use on-disk snapshots for exported logical decoding snapshot.
- b6ecf26ccc2b 9.4.12 landed
- 54270d7ebcdc 9.5.7 landed
- 29e8c881dd07 9.6.3 landed
- 56e19d938dd1 10.0 landed
-
Preserve required !catalog tuples while computing initial decoding snapshot.
- 5da64613875d 9.4.12 landed
- 47f896b5c2ec 9.5.7 landed
- 2bef06d51646 10.0 landed
- 28afff347a5d 9.6.3 landed