Re: pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the best column name
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-04-13T16:31:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 4/13/17 08:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> We have a bunch of > 3-character prefixes already: amop*, amproc*, > >> enum*, cast*. But I think I nevertheless like "ste" better. > > > "stx" perhaps? > > > I would also be in favor of changing it to something other than "sta". > > "stx" sounds pretty good to me --- it seems like e.g. "stxkind" is > more visibly distinct from "stakind" than "stekind" would be. > > Any objections out there? stx sounds good to me too. I'll see about a patch this afternoon. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Rename columns in new pg_statistic_ext catalog
- ee6922112e9b 10.0 landed