Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-12-14T16:06:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 09:46:44AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> My own take on it is that the release notes are already a massive > >> amount of work, and putting duplicative material in a bunch of other > >> places isn't going to make things better, it'll just increase the > >> maintenance burden. > > > > This would mean adding literally pages of material to the release notes. > > In the past, folks have been very negative on anything which would make > > the release notes longer. Are you sure? > > As that's a per-version information, that seems adapted to me. There > could be as well in the release notes a link to the portion of the > docs holding this manual. Definitely this should be self-contained in > the docs, and not mention the wiki. My 2c. Yes, that is the usual approach. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +