Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-01-11T19:03:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,
On 2016-01-09 15:29:11 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Hmm, I was just preparing this for commit.
Just read downthread that you want to commit this soon. Please hold of
for a while, this doesn't really look ready to me. I don't have time for
a real review right now, but I'll try to get to it asap.
> +
> +/*
> + * Reads 2PC data from xlog. During checkpoint this data will be moved to
> + * twophase files and ReadTwoPhaseFile should be used instead.
> + */
> +static void
> +XlogReadTwoPhaseData(XLogRecPtr lsn, char **buf, int *len)
> +{
> + XLogRecord *record;
> + XLogReaderState *xlogreader;
> + char *errormsg;
> +
> + xlogreader = XLogReaderAllocate(&logical_read_local_xlog_page,
> NULL);
logical_read_local_xlog_page isn't really suitable for the use
here. Besides the naming issue, at the very least it'll be wrong during
WAL replay in the presence of promotions on an upstream node - it
doesn't dealwith timelines.
More generally, I'm doubtful that the approach of reading data from WAL
as proposed here is a very good idea. It seems better to "just" dump the
entire 2pc state into *one* file at checkpoint time.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Commits
-
Speedup 2PC recovery by skipping two phase state files in normal path
- 728bd991c3c4 10.0 landed
-
Add tests for two-phase commit
- 30820982b295 10.0 landed
-
Improve grammar of message about two-phase state files.
- 38c363adf497 10.0 landed
-
Speedup 2PC by skipping two phase state files in normal path
- 978b2f65aa12 9.6.0 cited