Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-01-04T20:48:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:

> But you could also write SELECT relname FROM pg_class WHERE
> pg_relation_size(oid) > 100 * 1024^3, which is actually fewer
> characters.  Maybe pg_size_bytes('100 GB') is easier for some people
> to remember than 100 * 1024^3, but I'm probably not one of those
> people.

Nah, that might work for geek types, but I doubt it's the preferred
spelling for most people.  I think the proposal is quite reasonable.

If we were only catering for people who can do 2^10 arithmetic off the
top of their heads, we wouldn't have pg_size_pretty at all, would we?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


Commits

  1. Add pg_size_bytes() to parse human-readable size strings.

  2. Refactor check_functional_grouping() to use get_primary_key_attnos().

  3. Correct comment in GetConflictingVirtualXIDs()

  4. Make extract() do something more reasonable with infinite datetimes.

  5. pg_size_pretty: Format negative values similar to positive ones.

  6. pg_size_pretty(numeric)