Re: 10.0
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-06-17T17:04:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Merlin Moncure wrote: > Ugliness is a highly subjective qualifier. OTOH, Backwards > compatibility, at least when the checks are properly written :-), is a > very objective benefit. This is the argument that made us kept the PostgreSQL name instead of renaming back to Postgres. I'm not a fan of it. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services