Re: dealing with extension dependencies that aren't quite 'e'

At 2016-03-29 10:15:51 -0400, david@pgmasters.net wrote:
>
> Either way it looks like you need to post a patch with more
> documentation - do you know when you'll have that ready?

Here it is.

(I was actually looking for other potential callers, but I couldn't find
any. There are some places that take a RangeVar and make a list from it,
but they are creating new nodes, and don't quite fit. So the only change
in this patch is to add a comment above the get_object_address_rv
function.)

Álvaro, do you like this one any better?

-- Abhijit