Re: hung backends stuck in spinlock heavy endless loop
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-01-15T19:15:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,
> The plot thickens! I looped the test, still stock 9.4 as of this time
> and went to lunch. When I came back, the database was in recovery
> mode. Here is the rough sequence of events.
>
Whoa. That looks scary. Did you see (some of) those errors before? Most
of them should have been emitted independently of being built with
assertions.
> 1) REINDEXED pg_class (wanted clean slate for full reproduction)
> 2) before too long (unfortunately did not configure timestamps in the
> log) starting seeing:
>
> ERROR: root page 3 of index "pg_class_oid_index" has level 0,
> expected 1 at character 8
> QUERY: UPDATE CDSRunTable SET
> Finished = clock_timestamp(),
> DidSucceed = _DidSucceed,
> ErrorMessage = _ErrorMessage
> WHERE CDSRunTableId = _CdsRunTableId
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function cdsreconcileruntable(bigint) line 82 at
> SQL statement
> STATEMENT: SELECT CDSReconcileRunTable(2020)
>
> ..and again with a FATAL
> FATAL: root page 3 of index "pg_class_oid_index" has level 0, expected 1
> ERROR: root page 3 of index "pg_class_oid_index" has level 0, expected 1
> CONTEXT: SQL statement "UPDATE CDSRunTable SET
> Finished = clock_timestamp(),
> DidSucceed = _DidSucceed,
> ErrorMessage = _ErrorMessage
> WHERE CDSRunTableId = _CdsRunTableId"
> PL/pgSQL function cdsreconcileruntable(bigint) line 82 at SQL statement
Just to be absolutely clear, those happened *before* the following
errors? And there were no 'during exception cleanup' like errors before?
> 3) shortly (?) after that, I got:
>
> WARNING: did not find subXID 14955 in MyProc
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function cdsreconcileruntable(bigint) line 35
> during exception cleanup
> WARNING: you don't own a lock of type RowExclusiveLock
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function cdsreconcileruntable(bigint) line 35
> during exception cleanup
> LOG: could not send data to client: Broken pipe
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function cdsreconcileruntable(bigint) line 35
> during exception cleanup
> STATEMENT: SELECT CDSReconcileRunTable(2151)
> WARNING: ReleaseLockIfHeld: failed??
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function cdsreconcileruntable(bigint) line 35
> during exception cleanup
> ERROR: failed to re-find shared proclock object
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function cdsreconcileruntable(bigint) line 35
> during exception cleanup
> STATEMENT: SELECT CDSReconcileRunTable(2151)
> WARNING: AbortSubTransaction while in ABORT state
> WARNING: did not find subXID 14955 in MyProc
> WARNING: you don't own a lock of type AccessShareLock
> WARNING: ReleaseLockIfHeld: failed??
> ERROR: failed to re-find shared proclock object
> WARNING: AbortSubTransaction while in ABORT state
> WARNING: did not find subXID 14955 in MyProc
> WARNING: you don't own a lock of type AccessShareLock
> WARNING: ReleaseLockIfHeld: failed??
> WARNING: you don't own a lock of type ShareLock
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(FastPathStrongRelationLocks->count[fasthashcode]
> > 0)", File: "lock.c", Line: 1240)
> LOG: server process (PID 10117) was terminated by signal 6: Aborted
> LOG: terminating any other active server processes
Ick.
Were there any 'LOG: Handling deadlock detected on CdsRunTableId' log
entries before? It's hard to know from here, but the 'during exception
cleanup' indicates a problem in abort handling. Were there any deadlock
detected errors closeby?
You're catching deadlock errors in a subtransaction. Hm.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
-
Improve hash_create's API for selecting simple-binary-key hash functions.
- 4a14f13a0abf 9.5.0 cited
-
Fix WAL-logging of B-tree "unlink halfdead page" operation.
- c73669c0e016 9.5.0 cited
-
Fix backup-block numbering in redo of b-tree split.
- c91a9b5a285e 9.4.0 cited
-
Cleanup of new b-tree page deletion code.
- 4fafc4ecd9e4 9.4.0 cited
-
Fix bug in the new B-tree incomplete-split code.
- 4a5d55ec2b71 9.4.0 cited
- 954523cdfe22 9.4.0 cited
-
Fix bug in new B-tree page deletion code.
- 77fe2b6d795f 9.4.0 cited
-
Fix rm_desc routine of b-tree page delete records.
- 7d98054f0dd1 9.4.0 cited
-
Make the handling of interrupted B-tree page splits more robust.
- 40dae7ec537c 9.4.0 cited
-
Fix race condition in B-tree page deletion.
- efada2b8e920 9.4.0 cited