Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core@postgresql.org>
Date: 2015-05-29T20:07:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 04:01:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote:
> >> I am unclear if we are anywhere near ready for beta1 even in June.  Are
> >> we?
> 
> > I'm all about having that discussion...  but can we do it on another
> > thread or at least wait til we've decided about the back-branch
> > releases?  They are clearly the more important issue to consider.
> 
> It's the same discussion though, ie what releases are we expecting to
> get out in the next couple of weeks.

Agreed.  If we want to put out beta1 before PGCon, I need to start on
the release notes on Monday.

> It's possible that we ought to give up on a pre-conference beta.
> Certainly a whole lot of time that I'd hoped would go into reviewing
> 9.5 feature commits has instead gone into back-branch bug chasing this
> week.

Based on what has transpired in the past two weeks, I am thinking we
need to move _slower_, not faster.  I am concerned we have focused so
much on new features that we have taken our eye off of reliability.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


Commits

  1. Add Valgrind buffer access instrumentation.

  2. Fix wrong merge resolution making pg_receivexlog fail in 9.2.