Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: 2014-03-04T20:52:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > Alright- so do you feel that the simple ctidscan use-case is a
> > sufficient justification and example of how this can be generally
> > useful that we should be adding these hooks to core..?  I'm willing to
> > work through the patch and clean it up this weekend if we agree that
> > it's useful and unlikely to immediately be broken by expected changes..
> 
> Yeah, I think it's useful.  But based on Tom's concurrently-posted
> review, I think there's probably a good deal of work left here.

Yeah, it certainly looks like it.

KaiGai- will you have time to go over and address Tom's concerns..?

	Thanks!

		Stephen

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Support multi-argument UNNEST(), and TABLE() syntax for multiple functions.