Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>,
Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>,
Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: 2014-03-04T20:52:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > > Alright- so do you feel that the simple ctidscan use-case is a > > sufficient justification and example of how this can be generally > > useful that we should be adding these hooks to core..? I'm willing to > > work through the patch and clean it up this weekend if we agree that > > it's useful and unlikely to immediately be broken by expected changes.. > > Yeah, I think it's useful. But based on Tom's concurrently-posted > review, I think there's probably a good deal of work left here. Yeah, it certainly looks like it. KaiGai- will you have time to go over and address Tom's concerns..? Thanks! Stephen
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Support multi-argument UNNEST(), and TABLE() syntax for multiple functions.
- 784e762e886e 9.4.0 cited