Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>,
Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>,
Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: 2014-03-04T14:25:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > More generally, I think this discussion is focusing on the wrong set > of issues. The threshold issue for this patch is whether there is a > set of hook points that enable a workable custom-scan functionality, > and whether KaiGai has correctly identified them. Right- I was trying to hit on that in my email this morning. Thanks, Stephen
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Support multi-argument UNNEST(), and TABLE() syntax for multiple functions.
- 784e762e886e 9.4.0 cited