Horton

Re: Standalone synchronous master

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>, MauMau <maumau307@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev.rastogi@huawei.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-01-11T00:38:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Adrian,

* Adrian Klaver (adrian.klaver@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 04:25 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >* Adrian Klaver (adrian.klaver@gmail.com) wrote:
> >>A) Change the existing sync mode to allow the master and standby
> >>fall out of sync should a standby fall over.
> >
> >I'm not sure that anyone is argueing for this..
> 
> Looks like here, unless I am really missing the point:

Elsewhere in the thread, JD agreed that having it as an independent
option was fine.

> Well you will not please everyone, just displease the least.

Well, sure, but we do generally try to reach concensus. :)

	Thanks,

		Stephen