Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Palle Girgensohn <girgen@freebsd.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org>
Date: 2014-04-21T15:49:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add shared_memory_type GUC.
- f1bebef60ec8 12.0 landed
Hi, On 2014-04-21 11:45:49 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > That seems to make more sense. I can't imagine why this would be a runtime > parameter as opposed to build time. Because that implies that packagers and porters need to make that decision. If it's a GUC people can benchmark it and decide. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services