Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-04-17T19:00:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Merlin Moncure (mmoncure@gmail.com) wrote: > I doubt that's necessary though -- if the postgres caching algorithm > improves such that there is a better tendency for hot pages to stay in > s_b, Eventually the O/S will deschedule the page for something else > that needs it. In other words, otherwise preventable double > buffering is really a measurement of bad eviction policy because it > manifests in volatility of frequency accessed pages. I wonder if it would help to actually tell the OS to read in buffers that we're *evicting*... On the general notion that if the OS already has them buffered then it's almost a no-op, and if it doesn't and it's actually a 'hot' buffer that we're gonna need again shortly, the OS will have it. In other words, try to make the OS more like a secondary cache to ours by encouraging it to cache things we're evicting. Thanks, Stephen
Commits
-
Replace the BufMgrLock with separate locks on the lookup hashtable and
- 5d5087363d7c 8.1.0 cited