Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages?
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>,
Ants Aasma <ants@cybertec.at>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-04-16T13:14:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2014-04-16 07:55:44 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > > 1. Bgwriter needs to be improved so that it can help in reducing > > usage count and finding next victim buffer (run the clock sweep > > and add buffers to the free list). > > 2. SetLatch for bgwriter (wakeup bgwriter) when elements in freelist > > are less. > > 3. Split the workdone globallock (Buffreelist) in StrategyGetBuffer > > (a spinlock for the freelist, and an lwlock for the clock sweep). > > Here we can try to make it lock free based on atomic ops as > > well. > > 4. Bgwriter needs to be more aggressive, logic based on which it > > calculates how many buffers it needs to process needs to be > > improved. > > 5. Contention around buffer mapping locks. > > 6. Cacheline bouncing around the buffer header spinlocks, is there > > anything we can do to reduce this? > > 7. Choose Optimistically used buffer in StrategyGetBuffer(). > > 8. Don't bump the usage count every time buffer is pinned. > > What about: 9. Don't wait on locked buffer in the clock sweep. I don't think we do that? Or are you referring to locked buffer headers? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
-
Replace the BufMgrLock with separate locks on the lookup hashtable and
- 5d5087363d7c 8.1.0 cited