Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used

Thank you for committing this patch.

> Applied with some mostly-cosmetic adjustments.  I also took the
> liberty of changing some of the error message texts to line up
> more closely with the expanded documentation (eg, use "format
> specifier" not "conversion specifier" because that's the phrase
> used in the docs).

I looked over the modifications. Thanks for refining rather large
portion of documentation and comments.. and code.

regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center