Horton

Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>, Hari Babu <haribabu.kommi@huawei.com>, 'Craig Ringer' <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>, 'Hans-Jürgen Schönig' <hs@cybertec.at>, 'Ants Aasma' <ants@cybertec.at>, 'PostgreSQL Hackers' <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, 'Amit kapila' <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
Date: 2013-03-16T18:26:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> On the whole though, I don't see anything wrong with pointer-and-count.
> I don't really believe that there's ever going to be a need to enable
> more than a couple of timeouts simultaneously, so I don't want an overly
> complicated data structure for it.

Alright, fair enough.  

Zoltan, sorry for the back-and-forth Zoltan and thanks for being
persistent; I'd really like to see this capability added.

	Thanks again,

		Stephen