Re: WAL_DEBUG logs spurious data

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:06:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> writes:
> > On 10/11/2012 03:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The original design intention was that rm_desc should not attempt to
> >> print any such data, but obviously some folks didn't get the word.
> 
> > FWIW: in case the source code contains comments explaining that
> > intention, I certainly missed them so far.
> 
> Yeah, if we decide to stick with the limitation, some documentation
> would be called for.  I remember having run into this and having removed
> functionality from an rm_desc function rather than question the premise.
> But maybe the extra functionality is worth the cycles.

I assume there is no TODO item or patch here.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +