Re: Doc patch, normalize search_path in index
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-25T18:45:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- search_path2.diff (text/x-diff) patch
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:42:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:35:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> This patch seems pretty bizarre. What is the difference between a > >> "configuration parameter" and a "run-time setting"? Why would you > >> point people to two different places for those two terms? > > > Should I make them both "configuration parameter" and leave the > > "security" as a second one separate? > > Works for me. I think "configuration parameter" is the phrase we > use most places. OK, attached patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
doc: Improve search_path mentions in index
- a301eb99c953 9.3.0 cited