Re: COPY FREEZE has no warning
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2013-01-24T22:09:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- freeze.diff (text/x-diff) patch
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:02:46PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > As a reminder, COPY FREEZE still does not issue any warning/notice if > the freezing does not happen: > > Requests copying the data with rows already frozen, just as they > would be after running the <command>VACUUM FREEZE</> command. > This is intended as a performance option for initial data loading. > Rows will be frozen only if the table being loaded has been created > in the current subtransaction, there are no cursors open and there > are no older snapshots held by this transaction. If those conditions > are not met the command will continue without error though will not > freeze rows. It is also possible in rare cases that the request > cannot be honoured for internal reasons, hence <literal>FREEZE</literal> > is more of a guideline than a hard rule. > > Note that all other sessions will immediately be able to see the data > once it has been successfully loaded. This violates the normal rules > of MVCC visibility and by specifying this option the user acknowledges > explicitly that this is understood. > > Didn't we want to issue the user some kind of feedback? As no one wanted to write this patch, I have developed the attached version. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +