Re: logical changeset generation v4
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-15T04:00:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund wrote: I've been giving a couple of these parts a look. In particular > [03] Split out xlog reading into its own module called xlogreader Cleaned this one up a bit last week. I will polish it some more, publish for some final comments, and commit. > [08] wal_decoding: Introduce InvalidCommandId and declare that to be the new maximum for CommandCounterIncrement This seems reasonable. Mainly it has the effect that a transaction can have exactly one less command than before. I don't think this is a problem for anyone in practice. > [09] Adjust all *Satisfies routines to take a HeapTuple instead of a HeapTupleHeader Seemed okay when I looked at it. > Second, I don't think the test_logical_replication functions should live > in core as they shouldn't be used for a production replication scenario > (causes longrunning transactions, requires polling) , but I have failed > to find a neat way to include a contrib extension in the plain > regression tests. I think this would work if you make a "stamp" file in the contrib module, similar to how doc/src/sgml uses those. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services