Re: [PATCH 1/2] Provide a common malloc wrappers and palloc et al. emulation for frontend'ish environs

On 2013-01-09 11:45:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> How hard is the backend hit by palloc being now an additional function
> call?  Would it be a good idea to make it (and friends) STATIC_IF_INLINE?

Missed this at first...

I don't think there's any measurable hit now as there is no additional
function call as I chose to directly do the work directly in
palloc[0]. That causes a minor amount of code duplication but imo thats
ok. I didn't do that for pstrdup() but it would be easy enough to do it
there as well, but I don't think it matters there.

In a quick test I couldn't find any performance difference.

I don't think making them STATIC_IF_INLINE functions would help as I
think that would still require the CurrentMemoryContext symbol to be
visible in the callers context.

FWIW I previously measured whether the function call overhead via mcxt.c
is measurable and it wasn't...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- 
 Andres Freund	                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services