Re: Index build temp files
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-09T05:05:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > The code definitely will complain if you try to interactively SET > temp_tablespaces to a space you lack permissions for. However, there > has never been a case in which people would hold still for warnings > emitted as a consequence of values read from postgresql.conf or other > background sources, and I doubt that the response would be different > if we made this variable act like that. See for example past > discussions about what to do with invalid entries in search_path. Indeed, I fully expected the comparison argument to search_path, but I have to admit that search_path feels a great deal more like CWD, while the temp tablespaces is more like trying to write to /tmp and getting an error. That is to say, tablespaces and in particular temp tablespaces are much more 'system' level than search paths. I don't expect regular users to change their temp tablepace, while I expect them to change their search path on a regular basis. In any case, I was suggesting a NOTICE rather than a WARNING, though I appreciate that both could make noise for users who don't expect it. Still, I don't expect many users would complain about this, while they would complain about a similar thing for search_path. Perhaps that's not how they *should* act, but humans aren't always logical. :) Thanks, Stephen