Re: [PATCH 2/5] Make relpathbackend return a statically result instead of palloc()'ing it

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Uhm, we don't have & need palloc support and I don't think
> > relpathbackend() is a good justification for adding it.
> 
> I've said from the very beginning of this effort that it would be
> impossible to share any meaningful amount of code between frontend and
> backend environments without adding some sort of emulation of
> palloc/pfree/elog.  I think this patch is just making the code uglier
> and more fragile to put off the inevitable, and that we'd be better
> served to bite the bullet and do that.

As far as this patch is concerned, I think it's sufficient to do

#define palloc(x) malloc(x)
#define pfree(x) free(x)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services