Re: strange IS NULL behaviour
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-09-07T15:33:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:59:08AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > My original problem report was November, 2012: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/50B3D11F.20408@2ndQuadrant.com > > and my patch to fix this was July 4. Tom gave me a code snipped to test > PL/pgSQL's handling of record types. I tested that and it looked ok, > but there are other place to test that I don't know about. Correction --- my updates to Tom's suggestion was only posted September 4. Anyway, it is on the TODO list now. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +