Re: strange IS NULL behaviour

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-09-07T15:33:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep  7, 2013 at 10:59:08AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> My original problem report was November, 2012:
> 
> 	http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/50B3D11F.20408@2ndQuadrant.com
> 
> and my patch to fix this was July 4.  Tom gave me a code snipped to test
> PL/pgSQL's handling of record types.  I tested that and it looked ok,
> but there are other place to test that I don't know about.

Correction --- my updates to Tom's suggestion was only posted September
4. Anyway, it is on the TODO list now.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +