Re: pg_restore multiple --function options
David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2013-08-26T20:17:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:29:06PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Hi, > > While looking at the pg_restore code, I noticed that while it > supports specifying multiple --table options to restore several > tables, it does not support multiple --function options. Or --index, > --schema, or --trigger. > > The support for multiple --table options was added in 9.3, in > January. See http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAK3UJRG+yV1mK5twLfKVMCwXH4f6PnJou6Rn=ecabyfQH1vVHg@mail.gmail.com. > Was there a particular reason for only doing it for --table, or was > it just an oversight or lack of interest? No doubt that --table is > the most interesting one, but IMHO the other options should behave > the same, for the sake of consistency. +1 for making them consistent. There will also be an improvement in usability. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate