Horton

Re: proposal: enable new error fields in plpgsql (9.4)

Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh.lathia@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail@joh.to>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-06-28T13:20:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:49:46AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2013/6/28 Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:56:27PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >> cleaned patch is in attachment
> >
> > Of the five options you're adding to GET STACKED DIAGNOSTICS, four of them
> > appear in the SQL standard.  DATATYPE_NAME does not; I think we should call it
> > PG_DATATYPE_NAME in line with our other extensions in this area.
> >
> 
> yes, but It should be fixed in 9.3 enhanced fields too - it should be
> consistent with PostgreSQL fields

What else, specifically, should be renamed?  (Alternately, would you prepare a
new version of the patch incorporating the proper name changes?)

Thanks,
nm

-- 
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB                                 http://www.enterprisedb.com