Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Date: 2013-05-14T10:59:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Dimitri Fontaine (dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr) wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree with that view about pg_catalog. Sometimes we talk
> about moving some parts of core in pre-installed extensions instead, and
> if we do that we will want those extensions to install themselves into
> pg_catalog.

For my part, I'd still prefer to have those go into a different schema
than into pg_catalog.  Perhaps that's overkill but I really do like the
seperation of system tables from extensions which can be added and
removed..

	Thanks,

		Stephen

Commits

  1. Extend and improve use of EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS.

  2. Remove misplaced sanity check from heap_create().

  3. Silently ignore any nonexistent schemas that are listed in search_path.