Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
From: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Date: 2013-05-14T10:59:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Dimitri Fontaine (dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr) wrote: > I'm not sure I agree with that view about pg_catalog. Sometimes we talk > about moving some parts of core in pre-installed extensions instead, and > if we do that we will want those extensions to install themselves into > pg_catalog. For my part, I'd still prefer to have those go into a different schema than into pg_catalog. Perhaps that's overkill but I really do like the seperation of system tables from extensions which can be added and removed.. Thanks, Stephen
Commits
-
Extend and improve use of EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS.
- 4ae5ee6c9b4d 9.3.0 cited
-
Remove misplaced sanity check from heap_create().
- a475c6036752 9.3.0 cited
-
Silently ignore any nonexistent schemas that are listed in search_path.
- 880bfc3287dd 9.2.0 cited