Re: pg_upgrade problem with invalid indexes

* Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
> So we'll lose the index definition and leave some files behind? This
> sounds a bit messy to say the least.

Agreed.

> Making the user fix it seems much more sensible to me. Otherwise I
> suspect we'll find users who get strangely surprised when they can
> no longer find any trace of an expected index in their upgraded
> database.

Or preserve it as-is.  I don't really like the 'make them fix it'
option, as a user could run into that in the middle of a planned upgrade
that had been tested and never had that come up.

	Thanks,

		Stephen