Re: splitting *_desc routines
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-11-27T16:10:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- splitdesc-3.patch (text/x-diff) patch
Simon Riggs escribió: > On 23 November 2012 22:52, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > ./access/rmgrdesc/xact_desc.c > > ./access/rmgrdesc/heapdesc.c > > Could we have either all underscores _ or none at all for the naming? Sure, removed them all. Tom Lane escribió: > FWIW, I'd vote for dumping all of these into *one* rmgrdesc directory > (which may as well be under access/ since that's where the xlog code is), > regardless of where the corresponding replay code is in the source tree. > I don't think splitting them up into half a dozen directories adds > anything except confusion. If you want, the header comment for each > file could mention where the corresponding replay code lives. Done that way. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services