Re: Materialized views WIP patch
David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
From: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@mail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-26T16:05:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:02:17PM +0000, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On 26 November 2012 15:24, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: > > I hate to add to the bike-shedding, but we should probably add > > REFRESH SNAPSHOT as an optional piece of the grammar, with more > > REFRESH options to come. > > I don't know that they should be called materialised views, but do > we really need to overload the word snapshot? I'd just as soon > invent a new word as use the Oracle one, since I don't think the > term snapshot is widely recognised as referring to anything other > than snapshot isolation. I believe that the meaning here is unambiguous, and is used in other descriptions than Oracle's, including the one on our wiki. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Preserve intermediate .c files in coverage mode
- 4af3dda13601 9.3.0 cited